Over the last few hundred years, Western liberalism has enjoyed a long series of well-deserved moral victories over the evils of slavery, sexism, racism, ableism, ethnic bigotry, religious prejudice, anti-LGBT bigotry, and a host of other social ills. All of these battles were fought to advance the principle that every person deserves an equal opportunity to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. And so Western liberals found themselves repeatedly fighting for the rights of the downtrodden, the minorities, the oppressed. These victories were hard fought and rife with misery, to be sure, but we in the West undoubtedly live in a better world today due to the efforts of our liberal forebears. And there are many more battles to fight – more work to be done. Remnants of the old prejudices and bigotries still influence many people to this day, though it is far less socially acceptable than it once was*.
Despite these many victories, I’ve begun to notice a faction within the Western political left (a bastion of western liberalism since the latter part of the civil rights movement) that has begun to see the world through what might be called “oppression-tinted” lenses. To many on the western political left, we continue to live in a bigotry smorgasbord of sorts. And while I strongly identify with the desire to support the downtrodden and oppressed, I must also recognize that not everything can be reduced down to a binary description of oppressors and the oppressed. Being a big fan of John Stuart Mill’s idea that a person who knows only their own side of a case knows little even of that**, I will do my best to summarize the opposing side’s arguments in a way they would accept before criticizing those arguments. In my first post of this series, I’ll be discussing the concept of “privilege.”
Privilege
A privilege is generally understood as a right or benefit given to one person or group, but not to another person or group. In teaching their children, for example, parents use privileges all the time. A child might be given regular healthy food for dinner, for example, but have to earn the privilege of getting dessert by behaving well or doing homework/chores. In this case, all of the children are treated equally with respect to receiving the necessary basics (healthy food), but some might receive the privilege of dessert based upon the quality of their behavior.
But I don’t think that modern leftists are really referring to this type of privilege. Instead, they describe a wide range of advantages given to some – but not others- due to systemic inequalities in the legal and social arena. They sort these categories of privilege into things like white privilege, male privilege, straight privilege, Christian privilege, cis-gender privilege, and many others. They argue that our society is structured to provide these privileges in a systematic fashion to only certain groups. To return to the parenting analogy above, many modern leftists seem to be arguing that some children are receiving the necessary basics (healthy food) as the default while others must earn the healthy food – and let’s not even get into desserts. And many modern leftists encourage those benefitting from privilege to “check” their privilege. The intent here is to get someone to understand how they benefit from their privileges and how the lack of those privileges affect others. You can even check your own privilege here.
In this short piece, I won’t have time to go into every version of privilege on offer. So I’ll instead talk about the most common privilege mentioned – white privilege – and discuss implications from there. In her influential piece “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack“, Peggy McIntosh lists 50 privileges that she thinks she is afforded due – primarily – to her white skin. I doubt McIntosh would claim that her list is exhaustive, but since it is nevertheless quite extensive I’ve reproduced it here in the below three columns:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
You may be wondering why the left column has so many items listed and so few are listed in the middle and right columns. That is because I recognized some common themes in the items and sorted them by column accordingly. The column on the left can be thought of as the “healthy food” column. I think it’s entirely fair to say that – in an ideal society – everyone should have these. Race should be completely irrelevant to whether a person experiences the items in the left column. No one should need to earn these. Like healthcare in the US, having them should be the default as they are (largely) a prerequisite for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
The middle column might be thought of as the “dessert” column, in that they shouldn’t be the default (or available at all, really). In an ideal society, no one’s race should give them extra credibility, or an increased chance at getting accepted at University, or give them an excuse to be ignorant of other cultures. (I won’t get into the topic of affirmative action at the moment, but suffice to say I can see legitimate concerns on both sides.)
The right column contains items that I was genuinely confused by. I’m not sure that it’s just because they’re worded poorly or if they’re just really situational. For example, as a Caucasian I shouldn’t expect to see members of my race widely represented on the television if I move to Kenya, Mexico, or South Korea. Academic departments should focus on the published work relevant to their disciplines (and related disciplines) rather than the race of those doing the work. Being able to avoid people who I’ve been trained to mistrust (or who have been trained to mistrust me) isn’t necessarily a good thing. Maybe my training was based on an unwarranted stereotype or prejudice? And the same could be said about those who mistrust me. Lastly, I’m not confident that anyone should be able to arrange to be protected from the negative consequences of choosing to ignore minority perspectives.
The most interesting thing about the above table to me is that the items are disproportionately “healthy food” items. Which, if we grant McIntosh’s premise that white people are receiving a disproportion number of benefits in our society, means that the majority of McIntosh’s so-called “privileges” of being white are actually just necessities that most white people are appropriately receiving – but most racial minorities aren’t. In an ideal world, we would expect everyone to have these. Which makes them not really “privileges” at all.
So I would suggest that the way forward isn’t to alienate potential white allies by calling them out for having what everyone should have (e.g. “How dare you have the privilege of healthy food to eat! Check your privilege!”). It’s to ensure that everyone is, in fact, getting what they need. From McIntosh’s list, it seems that white people are already largely where they should be in terms of having access to necessities.*** The important work is in bringing other racial minorities up to that same level. That is where our outrage, our passion, and our efforts should be focused.
And the next time someone suggests the presence of some form of inappropriate privilege, think critically about it. Are they talking about some benefit that is being unfairly given to someone on an arbitrary basis? (e.g. race, religion, sex, gender, disability, etc…) If so, this “privilege” may well be something worth our concern. On the other hand, are they really just using “privilege” to talk about something more like healthy food? If that’s the case, then perhaps it’s time to delve a bit deeper with that person and help them explore the unhelpful consequences of this idea.
________________________________________________________________
*Imagine the response you’d receive today, versus 100 years ago, if you spoke in favor of racial apartheid in, say, a job interview.
**paraphrased
*** Though anyone who has spent any time amongst poor white people will rightly call this into question as well.